Talk:Modrules.lua: Difference between revisions
m nota bene |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
P.S. Use <nowiki>- ~~~~</nowiki> to get a timestamped user link like mine here (c.f. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Signatures ) | P.S. Use <nowiki>- ~~~~</nowiki> to get a timestamped user link like mine here (c.f. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Signatures ) | ||
Should we consider putting the pages in alphabetical rather than source? People coming to the wiki don't really care about source order and people with source order are already reading the source. [[User:Smoth|Smoth]] ([[User talk:Smoth|talk]]) 22:17, 25 February 2013 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 22:17, 25 February 2013
Page review
Page was an unsorted mess making it hard to read(wall of text) and hard to find things(arbitrary tag order).
tag missing, maybe dated and no longer exists in engine but I have this guy:
distance = {
builderUse2D = 0, -- defaults to 0
},
will investigate about missing tag and possible other missing tags. -Smoth
It was in source-order, but I've no objections to alphabetizing here (NB: Defs pages are also mostly in source-order, but it makes more sense there as tags tend to be grouped together by meaning in the source and the pages are so long ctrl+f is the best way to find tags anyway).
Increased spacing looks good.
No mention of builderUse2D in the engine source that reads ModRules.lua (or anywhere else - only hit in my whole Spring drive was Gundam). Reasonably sure nothing is missing but I'm not infallible ;) (this is one reason why engine source is always linked at the top of my pages)
- Flozi (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2013 (CET)
P.S. Use - ~~~~ to get a timestamped user link like mine here (c.f. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Signatures )
Should we consider putting the pages in alphabetical rather than source? People coming to the wiki don't really care about source order and people with source order are already reading the source. Smoth (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2013 (CET)
