CZTA plannedtactics: Difference between revisions
From Spring
Jump to navigationJump to search
Guessmyname (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
made historical |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Historical}} | |||
===GHE=== | ===GHE=== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
* Least powerful weaponry | * Least powerful weaponry | ||
* Least mobile tanks (the Psychasi tanks hover and the Tessarin tanks are amphibious) | * Least mobile tanks (the Psychasi tanks hover and the Tessarin tanks are amphibious) | ||
[[category:CZTA]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:22, 13 March 2010
|
This page contains outdated information, but is kept for historical reasons. |
GHE
ADVANTAGES
- Good defenses
- Conscripts are cheaper, and build quick
- Regulars are good fighters
- Can capture enemy resource buildings
- Powerful helicopters
DISADVANTAGES
- Tessarin have specialist anti-defense units
- Conscripts are crap in combat
- Regulars take a while to build
- Helicopters can be taken down easily by enemy AA and aircraft
- Forces split between conscripts and regulars
- Crap economy
- Least powerful weaponry
- Least mobile tanks (the Psychasi tanks hover and the Tessarin tanks are amphibious)
