Talk:Spring MT: Difference between revisions
From Spring
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "=== Why is this unofficial? === The code is more complex and some of the project members do not like this. Is the above really necessary? Seems like drama and honestly doesn..." |
m ask Spring MT clarifications |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Why is this unofficial? = | |||
The code is more complex and some of the project members do not like this. | The code is more complex and some of the project members do not like this. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is the above really necessary? Seems like drama and honestly doesn't belong in the wiki | Is the above really necessary? Seems like drama and honestly doesn't belong in the wiki | ||
[[User:Smoth|Smoth]] ([[User talk:Smoth|talk]]) 22:42, 14 March 2013 (CET) | [[User:Smoth|Smoth]] ([[User talk:Smoth|talk]]) 22:42, 14 March 2013 (CET) | ||
removed the above [[User:Smoth|Smoth]] ([[User talk:Smoth|talk]]) 22:48, 14 March 2013 (CET) | |||
---- | |||
I concur. Also I'm unsure if we shouldn't have a policy about talk pages (forum is superior in most respects) -- [[User:Flozi|FLOZi]] 22:58, 14 March 2013 (CET) | |||
...else banned from forum ! --[[User:Emmanuel|Emmanuel]] ([[User talk:Emmanuel|talk]]) 01:09, 27 March 2013 (CET) | |||
: | |||
: | |||
==what <big><sup>QTPFS</sup></big> ? == | |||
::i bet this sentence apply only for moddevelopers : " The Default pathfinder is recommended because the <big><big>QTPFS</big></big> pathfinder tends to kill the performance of <big><sub>Spring MT</sub></big>." | |||
<big><sup>QTPFS:</sup></big> | |||
*pro: <big>?</big> | |||
*con: <big>we know now!</big> | |||
: | |||
: | |||
==<big>what Spring MT ?</big>== | |||
*pro:100% better than spring single thread and unknow better from MultiThreaded | |||
*con:useless with <small>(the unknow but new !)</small><big><sup>QTPFS</sup></big> | |||
: | |||
: | |||
===the BA tournement :=== | |||
***is <big>your BA</big> tournement will be a DsD map or more? | |||
***maybe "Spring MT" make more larger maps PLAYABLES ? | |||
:::<sup><small>64*64 for exemple</small></sup> | |||
: | |||
: | |||
=====<sub><small>''how can i write huge colored text for being better read from blinds?''</small></sub>===== | |||
Latest revision as of 01:09, 27 March 2013
Why is this unofficial?
The code is more complex and some of the project members do not like this.
Is the above really necessary? Seems like drama and honestly doesn't belong in the wiki
Smoth (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2013 (CET)
removed the above Smoth (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2013 (CET)
I concur. Also I'm unsure if we shouldn't have a policy about talk pages (forum is superior in most respects) -- FLOZi 22:58, 14 March 2013 (CET) ...else banned from forum ! --Emmanuel (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2013 (CET)
what QTPFS ?
- i bet this sentence apply only for moddevelopers : " The Default pathfinder is recommended because the QTPFS pathfinder tends to kill the performance of Spring MT."
QTPFS:
- pro: ?
- con: we know now!
what Spring MT ?
- pro:100% better than spring single thread and unknow better from MultiThreaded
- con:useless with (the unknow but new !)QTPFS
the BA tournement :
- is your BA tournement will be a DsD map or more?
- maybe "Spring MT" make more larger maps PLAYABLES ?
- 64*64 for exemple
